HorsefeathersHorsefeathersHorsefeathers

January 17, 2003


POST-WAR IRAQ: NEVER MIND WINNING THEIR HEARTS AND MINDS

JUST GIVE THE IRAQIS JOB OPPORTUNITIES AND A FREE MARKET

AND THEIR HEARTS AND MINDS WILL FOLLOW


An opportunity of a century. Not since the end of the Second World War when America alone occupied Imperial Japan and transformed it into a modern, democratic, capitalist nation-state from what it had been for centuries—an isolated, reverential, hide-bound, under-capitalized state ruled by an emperor and his court. It took a couple of generations but the Japanese were hard workers and very fast learners—and then came the Honda and the Japanese began to beat the pants off industrial America. Now they are Americans themselves—scientists, bankers, businessmen, big-league pitchers. Would you have believed that back in 1945?

Would you believe in 2003 that something similar could happen in Iraq, and that in forty or fifty years the Iraqi national sport might be baseball?

If there is a war, and if we free the Iraqis by armed occupation, we will indeed have an opportunity of a century.

But let’s get a few basic things straight. It will take longer than the eighteen months that the White House optimistically projects. It could take a decade or more—but that needn’t be burdensome, expensive or difficult. If we administer the oil wells, in addition to giving the Iraqi people their own patrimony for the welfare of the country, rather than for presidential palaces or the development of weapons of mass destruction, a portion could be returned to the United States for the costs of occupation and military administration.

In addition, the military need only use a small fraction of its professional army for the work of occupation and military police. The bulk of the force could be mustered from our military reserves for periods of three or four month rotations. This would free our fighting army for other military needs and give our reserves a training experience that would be neither dangerous nor unfairly prolonged.

This unique opportunity in nation building would require as much unilateral decision making as possible—as was the case with Japan immediately after the end of World War II. It would indeed be a formidable diplomatic challenge to keep the United Nations and France and Russia in particular from meddling.

If all of the above were accomplished—a unilateral occupation force under control of the United States paid for by part of the proceeds from Iraqi oil—and the American people were comfortable with the challenge of giving the gift of American political values and economic ideas to the Iraqi people at no cost to us, then the first order of business would be to pacify the country and bring stability, law, and order with as little disturbance to the Iraqi people as possible. This, of course, would mean helping to restore the country’s infrastructure.

The essential features of this nation building challenge would be to plant the seeds of American values and nurture them until they are not only viable but sturdy enough to grow and propagate themselves. If we export these ideas and methods to the Iraqi people and help them adapt and fine tune the system so that it fits their own cultural values, then at some point in time—five, ten or fifteen years from now—the United States can fold its tent and go home with the feeling that it has enriched a people and been enriched in return.

The trick is to do good by doing well, and to demonstrate that it is possible to do so by using American ideas and methods. By planting the seeds of democracy and freedom to choose in a free market it would be possible to produce enough fruit for both America and Iraq to profit and prosper from the seed money—the private capital supplied by American and Iraqi bankers and protected by governmental guarantees and subsidies, American and Iraqi, to reduce risk. American and Iraqi businessmen would provide the skill and imagination to create large and small businesses which would give Iraqi citizens jobs and a regular income. And at some point in time these privately held businesses could become public and owned and operated for the benefit of their shareholders as well as their workers.

In order for this commercial development to occur we would have to help the Iraqis create a democratic constitution akin to ours, which would substitute for secular and religious dictatorship—no Saddam, no king, and no religious courts—the rule of laws. Then a modern meritocratic bureaucracy could be formed to administer legal, political, and commercial institutions adopted by the people—a process that would be enhanced by the pursuit of commercial activity, but might take a generation or more. And it is from this cadre that eventually governmental leaders would emerge.

Parallel to law building and the development of modern commercial institutions, the United States should encourage the development—out of private and/or public funds—of western-style schools for all children and young people who wish them. Let the old schools compete with the new and see which wins. And businessmen must be encouraged to start western-style newspapers—even English-language ones—television stations, and computer networks. Let the new media compete with the old and see which wins….

….Now fast forward to 2053, and turn to the headlines on the sports pages of the Tigris Times (owned by the Murdoch Corporation) and read that the Baghdad Dromedaries won the pennant of the Middle East League, and that Mohammed Mohammed (Momo to his fans) pitched a shut-out for the New York Yankees.

Posted at 12:26 PM by




Comments

Nice vision of possibilities, but I doubt the baseball thing, since the game is no longer our national passtime. More likely "Americanization" of Iraq would mean a 2053 Ali Akbar Springer show on Iraqui TV with topics like "My Three Wives All Want to Be Strippers" and World Wrestling Federation matches in Baghdad.

On a more serious note, I'm really worried that the Saudis et. al. can see the same possibilities as you and don't like them. What you suggest would mean the first capitalistic democracy in the Middle East (other than Israel) and that thought must make the sheiks, kings, and generals in that area very nervous. I suspect they working hard to get Sadaam to go into exile so they can get their own Islamist dictator on the Iraqui throne.

Posted by: John Battle on January 17, 2003 01:42 PM

We ought to have done this 12 years ago;we might be done by now. I said so at the time, and when Bush 41 stopped short of Baghdad I assumed our people had some cunning plan to topple Saddam and put some decent government in his place. Alas, their cunning plan turned out to be one devised by Baldrick, from the television series Blackadder, none of whose plans ever worked.

The actual root causes of terrorism lie in the dysfunctional Arab political culture. I am not optimistic we can make them see the virtues of a democratic republic like our own, but we must try. Installing something approaching a consenual government there will be a huge improvement.

Posted by: Michael Lonie on January 29, 2003 12:52 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?



<< Back to Horsefeathers