![]() ![]() ![]() |
December 27, 2002ANNOUNCING THE 2002 MAUREEN DOWD PSYCHOBABBLER OF THE YEAR PRIZE    This first annual Horsefeathers prize is named after the New York Times pundit in recognition of her unique combination of fatuous self-regard, shallowness of knowledge, condescension towards her betters and her grotesquely polemical misuse of psychological terms and ideas. A finer example of what Dr. Johnson called “articulate ignorance” could not be found. We're certain the many competitors who fell a little short of our winner will continue to strive towards the standard she has set. This year’s award winner captured the prize for comments he made just before his untimely demise so the award is, regrettably, a posthumous one.      When Samuel Johnson advised Boswell: “Clear your mind of cant” he was remarking on the ease with which we fill our minds with nonsense and cliches that we never question. Johnson had in mind the social hypocrisies that we all engage in, and while acknowledging the need for such hypocrisy, he cautioned against believing what we may be forced to say. Cant thinking eases the need for genuine critical thought, replacing it with clichéd and formulaic notions. While Johnson’s counsel holds for all time, even the great Doctor could not have anticipated the cant of our therapeutic age, nor the way we are inundated with it through the mass media. Horsefeathers, taking up Johnson’s injunction as our mission, awards Five feathers to the 2002 Psychobabbler of the Year.      The competitors included:      1)The Freud Museum, London, whose spokesman Ivan Ward enlisted Freud on the side of Yasser Arafat's terror apparatus. He assured us that Freud, were he alive today, would speak up on behalf of innocent Palestinian children brutally victimized by pathological Israelis.      2) The U.S. State Dept. utopians, from Colin Powell down who “explain” that the reason why Palestinians commit acts of terror is because they feel desperate and deprived. The therapeutic stance assumes that if we address their grievances with sufficient empathy they will feel better, become happy and civilized. Hatred is never irrational; it is caused by frustration, by insufficient caring, for which we are responsible. Hence the worse the barbarians behave, the more we need to empathize with their distraught state and help them gratify their wishes. This is the Officer Krupke, “we’re depraved, because we were deprived” school of psychotherapy      3) Dr. Carol Wolman informed us that in her professional psychiatric opinion the psychopath on the world scene was George W. Bush who was merely going after Saddam in order to win an “oedipal” triumph over daddy in order to win mommy’s love. What made this a particularly rich example of psychobabble was Dr. Wolman’s citation of the American Psychiatric Assn’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual to lend a patina of professional respectability to her diagnosis of a man she clearly loathed. The best psychobabblers, like Dr. Wolman, are relieved of the task of considering what practical policy choices are needed for dealing with the Saddams of the world, in favor of displaying for us their “deeper” understanding.      4) While Dr. Wolman was intent on diagnosing, i.e. pathologizing George W. Bush, Dr. Jerrold Post did the same for Saddam, telling us how the poor man suffered from the after effects of cruel mistreatment in his childhood. The diagnosis Dr. Post offered was designed to warn us against using force to subdue him because “malignant narcissists”, in Dr. Post’s view, are best treated with empathic care lest they become violent. Neither Dr. Wolman nor Dr. Post bothered to mention that the same traumatic early lives can be found in the background of many of the greatest human beings who ever lived—including Samuel Johnson.      Clearly it was a difficult choice by virtue of the worthiness of the contenders. Nevertheless our decision was clearcut. The winner of the 2002 Maureen Dowd prize is:      5)Sheikh Salah Sa’adeh. When asked whether young people blowing themselves up in order to kill Jews was a sign of mental health, he replied: "The stream of youths [who seek to] attain martyrdom shows [mental] health and the awareness of Palestinian society, and is not a mistake or an escape from a situation of despair or frustration. Many people come to Jihad, and they are willing to lay down their souls - which is the most precious thing a man has. There is a vast difference between someone who sacrifices money or an offering and someone who sacrifices his soul for the sake of Allah to bring happiness to the nation, and to remove its torment and distress."      On July 23, 2002 Sheikh Sa’adeh was killed in a missile strike by the Israel Defense Forces, in their own form of therapy, and in gratitude for his efforts towards improving the mental health of Palestinian youth.      The 2002 Maureen Dowd Prize with five feathers is therefore awarded posthumously to Sheikh Salah Sa’adeh. |
I love you. And, this is in full expression of a Freudian mind; as I began reading his books as a mere teenager. It rang bells then. It rings bells now. When we love someone we don't know it's a bubble contained in the mind ... like the idea of GOD. THANK YOU FOR BEING THERE to receive this heartfelt affection. Your words made me laugh. Maureen Dowd award, huh? Enough to curdle a man's balls, if he were alive, I think. WELL DONE! WELL DONE! Applause from the audience sounds strange when it reaches your stage. What can I tell ya?
Posted by: Carol Herman on December 27, 2002 07:32 PMJosh Chafetz of Oxblog has a good article on the 'Immutable Laws of Dowd' at
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/741snfel.asp
I just love the 'It's Better To Be Cute Than Coherent' law myself.
MonnkeyPants
Posted by: MonkeyPants on December 27, 2002 09:42 PMImperial Falconer
LOL!!! :D
Posted by: Jay on December 28, 2002 10:05 AMThe brothers Judd once commented "We salute the sentiment and relish the dismemberment."
The sentiment was some Kid Rock song, the dismemberment was the blasting into bone fragments and visceria of six Al-Qaeda fighters in yemen, by a CIA drone plane.
"We relish the dismemberment", that phrase has stuck with me, it so aptly describes my own feelings about the squashing of human cockroach Salah Sa’adeh.
I always thought I was a decent human, but I no longer give a shit about arabs. They have sown the wind too much, it's time they reaped it.
Posted by: Amos on January 8, 2003 02:19 AMFor what it's worth, the entire "clear your mind of cant" exchange between Boswell and Johnson can be found here. I'm not sure if hypocrisy is the right word for this phenomenon, though, but that's a quibble.
I'm not so sure that Johnson didn't experience unjustified, overblown partisan writing his time. One of his Rambler essays (#106, parts of which can be found here) deals with writing which is briefly popular and then soon forgotten because it is written in a political heat of the moment, discussing topics which are too transitory to give the writing any staying power.
Also, Johnson himself was the target of many barbs when he accepted his pension from the crown, and in Taxation No Tyranny Johnson threw some pretty broad punches himself.
So, while it's not the major point of your essay, I think you can find some solace in knowing that Maureen Dowd, while sometimes a raving lunatic in her columns, doesn't represent a worsening for civilization. We have seen her kind in the past, and we will see them again.
Posted by: Frank on February 17, 2003 09:19 AMYour site is typical right wing twisting of the truth to meet your own personal views. Maureen Dowd, whether you like her or hate her, as you obviously do, won a Pulitzer Prize in 1999. Have you approached that mark? I doubt it. But your anti-intelligentsia screeds, so familiar to anyone who knows history, are sad and irresponsible. Do you remember? "I disagree with what you say, but will fight to the death to defend your right to say it." --Voltaire. What happened to that kind of thinking in our current America? Why the endless streams of hate from the right wing, demonizing liberals and those who disagree with you? That's not debate. We are Americans first, Right Wingers, or Left Wingers, second. Or at least that's what the framers of the Constitution hoped for. What are your hopes for America? To put all those liberals, all those who disagree with you in jail? And as long as we're on Samuel Johnson, how about this one? "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel." As for horsefeathers, maybe the prize should go to GW Bush, who was AWOL and deserted his post during the VietNam War. Do you know the punishment for desertion during wartime? Look up Article 85 of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice. But maybe in your America, you don't think that applies to sons of privilege.
Posted by: Rev Big Tall Jim on February 19, 2003 09:46 AM